CREED usability scores
Data object usability scores calculated based on the CREED assessment
Source:vignettes/CREED_scores_data.qmd
Introduction
Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Exposure Datasets (CREED) is a framework for evaluating the relevance and reliability of a reference object for a given exposure assessment question across a series of questions. Users set criteria for it to be relevant to their question, and use a pre-defined set of reliability criteria.
The criterion scores assigned for each criterion during the CREED assessment are used to calculate an overall useability score for both Relevance and Reliability at the gold and silver level. Silver scores are calculated based on the highest (worst) score for all required questions, and gold for all recommended questions. Data source usability scores are, from high to low:
Usability Scores
Gold - Relevant/reliable without restriction
Gold - Relevant/reliable with restriction
Silver - Relevant/reliable with restriction
Silver - Relevant/reliable without restriction
Gold or Silver - Not usable
This table is automatically filled out by the eData app during the CREED assessment process.
initialise_CREED_scores_tibble()
#> # A tibble: 0 × 5
#> # ℹ 5 variables: REFERENCE_ID <chr>, SILVER_RELIABILITY <chr>,
#> # SILVER_RELEVANCE <chr>, GOLD_RELIABILITY <chr>, GOLD_RELEVANCE <chr>Variables
Reference ID
REFERENCE_ID - string, free, mandatory
Identifier for data source, foreign key referencing reference id.
Silver Reliability
SILVER_RELIABILITY - string, free, mandatory
Silver reliability score. See Usability Scores for valid levels.
Silver Relevance
SILVER_RELEVANCE - string, free, mandatory
Silver relevance score. See Usability Scores for valid levels.
Gold Reliability
GOLD_RELIABILITY - string, free, mandatory
Gold reliability score. See Usability Scores for valid levels.
Gold Relevance
GOLD_RELEVANCE - string, free, mandatory
Gold relevance score. See Usability Scores for valid levels.
CREED Bibliography
Adam Peters, Michael Beking, Leonard Oste, Mick Hamer, Jeanne Vuaille, Andrew J. Harford, Thomas Backhaus, Stephen Lofts, Claus Svendsen, Charles Peck, Assessing the relevance of environmental exposure data sets, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 20, Issue 4, 1 July 2024, Pages 1004–1018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4881
Graham Merrington, Lisa H. Nowell, Charles Peck, An introduction to Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Exposure Datasets (CREED) for use in environmental assessments, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 20, Issue 4, 1 July 2024, Pages 975–980, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4899
Carolina Di Paolo, Irene Bramke, Jenny Stauber, Caroline Whalley, Ryan Otter, Yves Verhaegen, Lisa H. Nowell, Adam C. Ryan, Implementation of the CREED approach for environmental assessments, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 20, Issue 4, 1 July 2024, Pages 1019–1034, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4909
Michelle L. Hladik, Arjen Markus, Dennis Helsel, Lisa H. Nowell, Stefano Polesello, Heinz Rüdel, Drew Szabo, Iain Wilson, Evaluating the reliability of environmental concentration data to characterize exposure in environmental risk assessments, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Volume 20, Issue 4, 1 July 2024, Pages 981–1003, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4893